Policy Details
Official titleAn Act Relative To Automotive Repair
Massachusetts Right to Repair
The issue
"The Motor Vehicle Owners’ Right to Repair Act guarantees every car owner's right to have their vehicle serviced at the repair facility of their choice, this was the Auto Care Association’s principal policy objective for many years. The industry’s wildly successful campaign in Massachusetts paved the way for a national solution, eventually finalized in a 2014 memorandum of understanding between the Auto Care Association, Coalition for Auto Repair Equality (CARE), and vehicle manufacturers. For the first time ever, new car manufacturers must make the same service information and tools available to independent repair shops that they provide for their franchised dealers. This MOU has become the model for right to repair agreements across the U.S. for many of the industries mentioned above. However, the Massachusetts Right to Repair law and subsequent national agreement specifically excluded telematics, which is the data transmitted wirelessly from the vehicle to the manufacturer, as written in the excerpt from the act relative to Automotive Repair (excerpt shown below). In order for the independent auto care industry to maintain and service today's ""connected"" vehicles, it must be granted access to this information. The industry once again took the fight to Massachusetts in 2020 in order to ensure Right to Repair applies to the next generation of vehicles. On November 3, Massachusetts voters overwhelmingly supported a ballot initiative that would provide car owners with access to their mechanical data and would permit owners to share that data with the repair shop of their choice. Read more here."
Auto Care position
The Auto Care Association supports this measure which ensures Massachusetts citizens can allow their repairer of choice to access their vehicle repair and maintenance data. It promotes transparency and consumer rights while preserving the cybersecurity of their vehicle and its data.
Impact
Passage of this legislation means that car owners will continue to determine where they have their vehicle maintained and repaired, thus ensuring a competitive repair marketplace in Massachusetts. Supporters further hope that action by Massachusetts voters will spur serious consideration of federal legislation to ensure that all U.S. car owners can continue to decide where and how their vehicle is maintained.
Status
November 3, 2020: Massachusetts voters overwhelmingly approved the ballot initiative, requiring:
- Prospective vehicle owners to receive notice explaining motor vehicle telematics, what mechanical data is collected, and their right to access it and authorize an independent shop to use it for diagnostics, repair, and maintenance.
- Manufacturers using telematics systems, starting with model year 2022, will equip vehicles with an interoperable, standardized, open-access platform that securely communicates mechanical data via direct data connection.
- Standardized access to onboard diagnostic systems that doesn't require manufacturer authorization.
Automakers ran a multi-million-dollar campaign against the measure, warning voters it threatened vehicle safety and data security, and lobbied federal lawmakers to preempt it without offering federal standards of their own. They then filed a lawsuit to overturn the law, which went to a bench trial in 2021. The ruling was delayed repeatedly before U.S. District Judge Denise Casper dismissed the remaining claims in February 2025, a win for independent shops and consumers.
That wasn't the end of it. Auto Innovators appealed, and the case is now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 25-1262. At oral argument on February 3, 2026, Auto Innovators conceded that its automaker members could safely comply with the law as the district court interpreted it, abandoning the central argument that compliance was impossible. The court asked both sides whether they wanted to settle through mediation. On February 25, 2026, the Massachusetts Attorney General's office said no, telling the court there's nothing left to mediate since the case turns on the law's facial validity, something only the state legislature can change. The AG's office also noted that some manufacturers have used the pending case as a reason to delay compliance and asked the court to rule to provide clarity to both sides. The case remains pending.
The fight for the same protections nationwide continues through the federal REPAIR Act (H.R. 1566 / S. 1379), introduced in February 2025 and still before Congress.